| Oct 04, 2024 |
|
|
|
(Nanowerk News) One of the great challenges of modern cosmology is to reveal the nature of dark matter. We know it exists (it constitutes over 85% of the matter in the Universe), but we have never seen it directly and still do not know what it is. A new study published in JCAP (“Cosmic-Ray Propagation Models Elucidate the Prospects for Antinuclei Detection”) has examined traces of antimatter in the cosmos that could reveal a new class of never-before-observed particles, called WIMP (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles), which could make up dark matter. The study suggests that some recent observations of “antinuclei” in cosmic rays are consistent with the existence of WIMPs, but also that these particles may be even stranger than previously thought.
|
|
“WIMPs are particles that have been theorized but never observed, and they could be the ideal candidate for dark matter,” explains Pedro De la Torre Luque, a physicist at the Institute of theoretical physics in Madrid other and other particles only through gravity and the weak interaction force, one of the four fundamental forces that operates only at very close distances.”
|
 |
| The image shows the predicted flux of antihelium-3 produced from dark matter (WIMPs) that annihilate producing these antinuclei. Each color represents the prediction for a different mass of dark matter, as shown in the legend. The bands are almost touching the AMS-02 sensitivity, which means that in some optimistic cases, WIMPs can explain this discrepancy. (Image: De la Torre Luque et al.)
|
|
A few years ago, the scientific community hailed a “miracle”: WIMPs seemed to meet all the requirements for dark matter, and it was thought—once it was “imagined” what they could be and how they could be detected—that within a few years we would have the first direct evidence of their existence. On the contrary, research in recent years has led to the exclusion of entire classes of these particles, based on their peculiar emissions. Today, although their existence has not been entirely ruled out, the range of possible WIMP types has narrowed significantly, along with the methodologies for trying to detect them. “Of the numerous best-motivated proposed models, most have been ruled out today and only a few of them survive today,” says De la Torre Luque.
|
|
A recent discovery, however, seems to have reopened the case. “These are some observations from the AMS-02 experiment,” De la Torre Luque explains. AMS-02 (Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer) is a scientific experiment aboard the International Space Station that studies cosmic rays. “The project leaders revealed that they detected traces of antinuclei in cosmic rays, specifically antihelium, which no one expected.”
|
|
To understand why these antinuclei are important for WIMPs and dark matter, one must first understand what antimatter is.
|
|
Antimatter is a form of matter with electrical charge opposite to that of “normal” matter particles. If you’ve followed physics lessons in school, you’ll know that ordinary matter, the stuff around us, is made up of particles with negative electric charge, like electrons, positive charge (protons), or neutral charge. Antimatter is composed of “mirror” particles with opposite charges (a “positive” electron, the positron, a “negative” proton, etc.). When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate each other, emitting strong gamma radiation. In our universe, composed overwhelmingly of normal matter, there is a small amount of antimatter, sometimes closer than one might think, given that positrons are used as contrast agents for PET, the medical imaging exam that some of you may have undergone.
|
|
Some of this antimatter was formed—scientists believe—during the Big Bang, but more is constantly created by specific events, which makes it very significant to observe. “If you see the production of antiparticles in the interstellar medium, where you expect very little, it means something unusual is happening,” De la Torre Luque explains. “That’s why the observation of antihelium was so exciting.”
|
 |
| Expected antideuteron flux produced from the interactions of cosmic rays (high-energy particles in the Galaxy, mainly protons and helium) with the gas in the interstellar medium. These are compared with the flux of antideuteron that different experiments can detect (GAPs, the experiment that will be launched by the end of this year, and AMS-02, that has two detectors, the RICH and the TOF). In this figure you can see that the flux produced (the blue band) from cosmic-ray interactions may explain some events observed by the AMS experiment. (Image: De la Torre Luque et al.)
|
|
What produces the antihelium nuclei observed by AMS-02 could indeed be WIMPs. According to the theory, when two WIMP particles meet, in some cases they annihilate, meaning they destroy each other, emitting energy and producing both matter and antimatter particles. De la Torre Luque and his colleagues have tested some of the WIMP models to see if they are compatible with the observations.
|
|
The study confirmed that some observations of antihelium are hard to explain with known astrophysical phenomena. “Theoretical predictions suggested that, even though cosmic rays can produce antiparticles through interactions with gas in the interstellar medium, the amount of antinuclei, especially antihelium, should be extremely low,” De la Torre Luque explains. “We expected to detect one antihelium event every few tens of years, but the around ten antihelium events observed by AMS-02 are many orders of magnitude higher than the predictions based on standard cosmic-ray interactions. That’s why these antinuclei are a plausible clue to WIMP annihilation.”
|
|
But there may be more. The antihelium nuclei observed by AMS-02 are of two distinct isotopes (the same element, but with a varying number of neutrons in the nucleus), antihelium-3 and antihelium-4. Antihelium-4, in particular, is much heavier and also much rarer.
|
|
We know that the production of heavier nuclei becomes increasingly unlikely as their mass increases, especially through natural processes involving cosmic rays, which is why seeing so many of them is a warning sign. “Even in the most optimistic models, WIMPs could only explain the amount of antihelium-3 detected, but not antihelium-4,” De la Torre Luque continues, and this would require imagining a particle (or class of particles) even stranger than the WIMPs proposed so far, or in technical jargon, even more “exotic.”
|
|
Thus, De la Torre Luque and his colleagues’ study indicates that the path toward WIMPs is not yet closed. Many more precise observations are now needed, and we may have to expand or adapt the theoretical model, perhaps introducing a new dark sector into the standard model of known particles to date, with new “exotic” elements.
|
